Popular Posts

Sunday, 26 July 2009

Open letter to president Obama

Lou Pritchett had a 36-year career with Proctor & Gamble, ending his tenure as Vice President World Sales. He is a living legend in corporate America, a well-known public speaker, acclaimed author and highly regarded as the world’s leading expert in Change Management. He wrote the following opinion piece and submitted it to the New York Times for publication. Hat tip to Sarah’s Albion Blog for picking this one up from Urban Legends and American Family Association.

Carefully read his comments to Obama and tell me what parallels you can draw between that and the average black African politician, especially Mandela, in the context of South Africa.

Beware America, a very wise man on The Right Perspective once said “South Africa’s present is America’s future”.

president_obamaDear President Obama:

You are the thirteenth President under whom I have lived and unlike any of the others, you truly scare me.

You scare me because after months of exposure, I know nothing about you.

You scare me because I do not know how you paid for your expensive Ivy League education and your upscale lifestyle and housing with no visible signs of support.

You scare me because you did not spend the formative years of youth growing up in America and culturally you are not an American.

You scare me because you have never run a company or met a payroll.

You scare me because you have never had military experience, thus don’t understand it at its core.

You scare me because you lack humility and ‘class’, always blaming others.

Lou PritchettLou Pritchett

You scare me because for over half your life you have aligned yourself with radical extremists who hate America and you refuse to publicly denounce these radicals who wish to see America fail.

You scare me because you are a cheerleader for the ‘blame America’ crowd and deliver this message abroad.

You scare me because you want to change America to a European style country where the government sector dominates instead of the private sector.

You scare me because you want to replace our health care system with a government controlled one.

You scare me because you prefer ‘wind mills’ to responsibly capitalizing on our own vast oil, coal and shale reserves.

You scare me because you want to kill the American capitalist goose that lays the golden egg which provides the highest standard of living in the world.

You scare me because you have begun to use ‘extortion’ tactics against certain banks and corporations.

You scare me because your own political party shrinks from challenging you on your wild and irresponsible spending proposals.

You scare me because you will not openly listen to or even consider opposing points of view from intelligent people.

You scare me because you falsely believe that you are both omnipotent and omniscient.

You scare me because the media gives you a free pass on everything you do.

You scare me because you demonize and want to silence the Limbaughs, Hannitys, O’Reillys and Becks who offer opposing, conservative points of view.

You scare me because you prefer controlling over governing.

Finally, you scare me because if you serve a second term I will probably not feel safe in writing a similar letter in 8 years.

Lou Pritchett

Friday, 24 July 2009

A picture is worth 30,000 lives (a year)

For those of you not so informed about the history of South Africa and also for the demented liberals - the AWB (Afrikaner Weerstands Beweging - Afrikaner Resistance Movement) is one of the most right wing movements in South Africa. Should the thought of the BNP in Britain send shivers down your spine, the hard-nosed stance and beliefs of the AWB would certainly make you soil your best underwear. So you get the picture? And, by the way, I am not criticizing the beliefs of the AWB - I merely want to put something into perspective for you. The following photo was taken during recent protests for lack of basic services in South Africa. See what these people think of the ANC compared to that ugly bunch of white Nazis (I’m confident the liberals won’t mind me abusing their terminology for a change). Oh, and for the title of this post, I thought the annual estimated murder statistics in South Africa would be an apt reference to the achievements of the ANC.

awb_better_than_anc

Tuesday, 21 July 2009

Monday, 20 July 2009

SA stops funding for AIDS vaccine research

Even though a positive spin is put on this article, the reality is that Whitey ends up paying for the bugger-ups of the communist ANC bafoons.  If it isn’t Whitey the taxpayer in South Africa, it’s Whitey the taxpayer in the United States.

30-may08x

from The Washington Post, by Michelle Faul (The Associated Press)

CAPE TOWN, South Africa -- South Africa has stopped funding research on an AIDS vaccine, a leading scientist said Monday, even as a major vaccine trial on humans began in the country ravaged by the world's worst AIDS epidemic.

Anna-Lise Williamson, an AIDS researcher at the University of Cape Town, told The Associated Press that the clinical vaccine trial that began Monday would continue with U.S. money. But she said South Africa's Department of Science and Technology had stopped funding her research this year and the utility Eskom's contract for funding ended last year and was not renewed.

Even though South Africa's science minister appeared at a ceremony launching the vaccine trial with Williamson and lauded her research, neither he nor Eskom immediately returned calls seeking comment about funding.

At the ceremony, one of 36 healthy volunteers was injected Monday before officials and journalists in Cape Town's Crossroads shantytown. The event was also attended by American health officials who gave technical help and manufactured the vaccine at the U.S. National Institutes of Health.

"For vaccine development presently, the South African AIDS Vaccine initiative has no money," Williamson said. "If we do not continue working on this, we will never have a vaccine... it's incredibly important that we keep working."

The South African vaccine, developed at the University of Cape Town, targets the specific HIV strain that has ravaged South Africa.

During nearly 10 years of government denial and neglect, South Africa developed a staggering AIDS crisis. Around 5.2 million South Africans were living with HIV last year - the highest number of any country in the world. Young women are hardest hit, with one-third of those aged 20-to-34 infected with the virus.

AIDS vaccine researchers have met so many disappointments some activists are questioning the wisdom of continuing such expensive investments, saying the money might be better spent on prevention and education.

A new report says HIV vaccine research funding worldwide decreased for the first time since 2000, with investments of almost $1.2 billion in 2008, down 10 percent from 2007.

South Africa was also the site of the biggest setback to AIDS vaccine research, when the most promising vaccine ever, produced by Merck & Co. and tested here in 2007, found that people who got the vaccine were more likely to contract HIV than those who did not.

South African scientists working on the latest vaccine had to overcome deep skepticism from their political leaders, who had shocked the world with their unscientific pronouncements about the disease. Williamson said South Africa, at the heart of the epidemic, must press ahead with trials to test the safety of the vaccine.

"We have got the biggest ARV (anti-retroviral) rollout in the world and still hundreds of people are dying every day and getting infected everyday," she said.

Williamson's vaccine also is being tested at a trial of 12 volunteers in Boston that began earlier this year, said Anthony Mbewu, president of South Africa's government-supported Medical Research Council that shepherded the project.

"It is being very well tolerated, no adverse events, so it is going very well," Williamson said Monday.

The trial started in the U.S., partly to allay any criticism that the United States was collaborating in an AIDS vaccine that would use Africans as guinea pigs.

The government decided it was important to develop a vaccine specifically for the HIV subtype C strain that is prevalent in southern Africa "and to ensure that once developed, it would be available at an affordable price," Mbewu said.

Some 250 scientists and technicians worked on the latest vaccine project.

Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the U.S. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease and a leading AIDS researcher, said the South African scientists received more money from his institute's research fund than any others in the world except the U.S. The U.S. had paid to produce the vaccine.

He called it "the most important AIDS research partnership in the world."

But he warned "There are extraordinary challenges ahead," referring to the years of testing needed now that South Africa has reached the clinical trial stage.

At an international AIDS conference in Cape Town, Vice President Kgalema Motlanthe emphasized Sunday night that the clinical trials were being held "under strict ethical rules."

Mbewu said the crisis in South Africa more than justifies the expenditure on AIDS research. AIDS strikes men and women alike in Africa, where the epidemic is fueled by the many people who have sex with several people at the same time.

In the 1990s, South Africa's then-President Thabo Mbeki denied the link between HIV and AIDS, and his health minister, Manto Tshabalala-Msimang, mistrusted conventional anti-AIDS drugs and made the country a laughing stock trying to promote beets and lemon as AIDS remedies.

Williamson, a virologist, said the scientists had to fight constant controversy, including international organizations that tried to stop the state utility Eskom from funding the project. Eskom gave "huge amounts" regardless, she said.

"International organizations told Eskom that this was a terrible waste of money, that putting money into South African scientists was like backing the cart horse when they need to be backing the race horse," she said.

Even her research director told her she was wasting her time.

"Most of them just made us more determined to prove them wrong," Williamson said.

Sunday, 19 July 2009

White folks gonna riot and I'm gonna join them

Hat tip: I Luv SA

Friday, 17 July 2009

Hitler finds out Michael Jackson has died.

Sunday, 12 July 2009

Never mix low IQ with High-Technology

Sarah Palin

Hat tip to Sarah’s Albion Blog and The Radio Equalizer for the following interesting, or should I rather say absurd, bit heard on The Al Sharpton Show. A female caller by the name of Ashley proposed the conspiracy theory that Sarah Palin stepped down from office because she could be responsible for Michael Jackson’s demise.

However absurd and delusional this sounds, I am not surprised. I might have been. That is until I heard the name Al Sharpton. The moment that came into the mix, the outcome was always going to be a disaster of monumental proportions. And what could Al’s response possibly be to such utter drivel? “All right, thank you for your call, Ashley. That’s interesting.”

Al Sharpton

Interesting? That one word gives us enough insight into the jungle bunny mindset, the mud hut mentality and utter ignorance of one Al Sharpton. Which also explains why this African American would be more at home behind a jungle drum on the dark continent than a microphone in the greatest country on earth.

Since the terrible, racist whites enslaved you and your forefathers Mr Sharpton, why don’t you rectify the situation and move back to the dark continent? It is still there. Your brothers and sisters are still there. To this day you still associate your existence with them - you call yourself African American don’t you? So why don’t you move there? Your African heritage seems more important to you than your American one.

Or are the insults thrown at white people only convenient to put idiotic liberals on white-guilt trips and make you more money? It’s not really about your history and heritage, is it? It’s about a comfortable lifestyle which somebody else pays for.

Here is the transcript of the call:

FEMALE CALLER: He (Michael Jackson) is truly the soundtrack of my life. I also have a theory about Sarah Palin as well and I’m going to put it out there on radio, hopefully someone can investigate.

But, I think maybe she did something to Michael Jackson. Maybe there’s a scandal there. Maybe she’s stepping down because something’s about to come out. I don’t know, but I’m gonna just put it out there on your show so we’ll see.

SHARPTON: All right, thank you for your call, Ashley. That’s interesting. I’ll put it out, we’ll see. I don’t know.


You can listen to the sound clip here, care of The Radio Equalizer.

Friday, 10 July 2009

Mark Levin On Joe Biden

Will Malema say sorry?

From News @ iAfrica:

2662-6436-0-0_1755032 ANC Youth League president Julius Malema is expected to appear in the Equality Court in Johannesburg on Friday over a statement he made about a woman who laid a rape charge against President Jacob Zuma.

In his defence on Thursday, his lawyer said the comment was directed specifically at the woman who made the charge, and that it was based on comments made by the judge who acquitted Zuma.

The Sonke Gender Justice Network laid a complaint of hate speech, discrimination and harassment against Malema, saying the comments perpetuated myths and stereotypes on rape.

They want a full apology and R50 000 in damages to be paid to a shelter for abused women.

In January this year, Malema reportedly told students at the Cape Peninsula University of Technology that President Jacob Zuma's rape accuser would not have stayed for breakfast if she had not enjoyed the sex.

"Those who had a nice time will wait until the sun comes out, request breakfast and ask for taxi money. In the morning, that lady requested breakfast and taxi money," Malema said.

I can only conclude that Malema is a glutton for punishment.  Apart from being a total moron…

Not Pee Cee Michael Jackson Jokes

creepyjackomaskOK. We get it. The guy was a great entertainer. He had dance routines like nobody else on the planet. Many attempted to copy his moves. They just couldn’t. Just ask Justin Timberlake.

So Michael was good - let’s call it brilliant. For all he achieved, he was more than adequately rewarded. I confess that I have a couple of his DVDs. And CDs. The stuff he made before he turned himself into a freak show. Bizarre as it may be, I can even understand this from the perspective of the inadequacies that obviously haunted him. That is the only possible explanation for doing to himself what he did.

But why couldn’t he leave the kids alone? For all that he had going for him, why did he go down that route? As much as I wanted to give him the benefit of the doubt, the facts portrayed a different image.

So Michael was indeed good. He was brilliant. But he was not God. So forgive me for not worshipping him. Or not. I don’t really care.

 

Michael’s body will be donated to Lego. It will be melted down into plastic blocks so little kids can play with him for a change.

Michael has cancelled all upcoming dates. One is Thomas aged 9. Another is Dylan aged 6.

Michael’s last words as he was being driven to hospital: “Is there any room in the children’s ward?”

Reports of Michael Jackson dying is incorrect. He was caught in the children’s ward having a stroke.

Wednesday, 8 July 2009

Barry Farber and The Great Frank on SA history

from The Right Perspective:

soundboard.com

Talk Radio legend Barry Farber discusses South African history with The Great Frank from Queens.

The Zimbabwean Titanium Trillion Dollar Campaign

Pete King speaks out against honoring Michael Jackson

Sunday, 5 July 2009

Farrah Fawcett Tribute To An Angel

Saturday, 4 July 2009

Wake Up Britain 8

Friday, 3 July 2009

Pre World Cup Agitprop BS

from South Africa Sucks

According to a report released in Europe earlier this week, the following astounding statistical assertions are made:

1. That Britain is a more criminally violent society than South Africa;

2. That even Austria’s crime situation is substantially worse than South Africa.

Yes, you read right. The European Commission’s report states the following laughable bullshit:

Violent Crime Per 100 000 people

Britain:                2 034

Austria:               1 677

South Africa:       1 609

Sweden:               1 123

Annual Murder Rate

Britain:                 921

South Africa:        20 000

Austria and the UK has more violent contact crime than SA? AUSTRIA, of all places! These figures are so patently false and laughably ridiculous, one is stunned that some imbeciles are actually taking them seriously! One of our regular readers is a wealthy Austrian (ALL SA-based Austrians I’ve met are stupendously wealthy, as is usually the result of having a stratospheric IQ, combined with a Germanic work ethic and that Teutonic entrepreneurial spirit, but I digress) - ZIPF, please let us have your views on the claim that the magnificent classical cities Vienna, Salzburg and Innsbruck are dangerous n---er-infested slums on par with, and even more dangerous than Soweto, Alexandra and Khyelitsha…

Various “experts” cited by the British media said that the concept of “violence” is interpreted differently in different countries. With their slew of insane peecee laws I’m not surprised…for example, glaring ominously at another driver while sitting at a traffic light constitutes a violent act. Farting in a lift is violent antisocial behaviour. Giving someone the finger is probably Assault with the intent to do Grievous Bodily Harm, not to mention Crimen Injuria and the endless list of thought crimes you can now be charged with.

At the same time, in SA a completely different set of rules apply. Six bullet holes in the back of someone’s skull is put down to “suicide” - having your head & hands hacked off with a machete is a bad shaving accident, being disembowelled with a rusted tomahawk axe and having your liver & heart ripped out & eaten while still alive is recorded as “domestic violence” or “death through natural causes” or “poisoning”. If you’re lucky, being gang-raped by eight rapacious beasts might be listed as “sexual harassment” but only if you can name your assailants and are in possession of their ID numbers, residential addresses and their genealogical records for the past 60 years…

OK, perhaps I’m exaggerating a tad now but his is the kind of comparison these idiots are making. Unless its part of some cynical propaganda campaign to butter up prospective FIFA 2010 tourists to the criminal hell hole of Arsezania.

As expected, the usual coon criminal-loving denialists (who sooo detests this horribly incorrigible racist blog but spend hours and days here trolling their revisionist crap) wasted no time in plastering these worthless “statistics” all over the SAS comments sections, eager to “prove” that the out of control warzone like conditions we so regularly feature is a mere “perception”.

Some wise sage once said you got “lies, damned lies, and statistics”. Its truly amazing what you can do with stats - another clever dick once ‘proved’ that the increase in Japanese motorcycle imports to Europe was directly correlated to a decrease in cervical cancer amongst small town dwelling Catholic women with perky boobs, between the ages of 30 and 45 who had a predilection for rubbing Old Spice aftershave behind their ears.

With regard to the crime situation in the UK, there is no doubt that crime has sky-rocketed in past few years. Its still nowhere near SA levels, but with a flood of mud races to the British Isles, and massive infestations of shit skins in major cities certain neighbourhoods (e.g. Bradford, Brixton) have become de facto no-go areas for White Britons. See the link below for some mug shots of who is held responsible for violent crime in the UK: I an an Englishman website

Some Brits are waking up to the creeping turd world erosion of their way of life and this has seen an astronomical growth in rightist parties like the UKIP and especially the British National Party.

Most notable has been the growth of the BNP in areas most heavily infested by Paki’s, Jamaicans, Nigerians and other turd world vermin. If anything, this little factoid again proves that the luxurious, self-righteous multi-culti position of being a bleeding heart non-racialist quickly dissipates as cold, hard racial truth forces one to revisit one’s premises. Except of course for those pathological basket cases who stalk & troll this blog, but then I guess every village has to have a few idiots.

These ridiculous stats amazingly show UK violent crime to be far worse than that in SA, yet the same report reflects a UK murder rate of 921 per annum, compared to the SA murder rate of 20 000. Said figure of 20 000 has strangely been stuck at the 20K mark since the late 1990’s - anyone living in SA has seen an astronomical rise in criminality in the past 14 years, so how this figure remains static at 20K is rather odd.

Interpol and various other credible agencies (insurance & vehicle tracking companies etc) have put the figure at anywhere between 30 000 and 35 000 murders per annum in SA. Instead of the supposed 50 murders a day, the Medical Research Council puts the figure at 89 murders per day (and this was back in 2003/4). Read that report here.

———

More violent crime in Britain (than in SA)

2009-07-03 08:08

London - Statistics compiled by the European Commission indicate that there is more violent crime in Britain than in South Africa.

The British public, who are often warned about the situation regarding crime in South Africa, were caught off-guard by this news.

As far as violence in relation to population size is concerned, Britain is at the top of the list according to these statistics, with 2 034 violent crimes for 100 000 people in 2007.

In Austria this figure is 1 677 for 100 000 people, in South Africa it’s 1 609 and in Sweden it’s 1 123. The South African figure was an average for the period 2006 to 2007.

According to the British media, however, South Africa is still the world’s murder capital, with approximately 20 000 murders committed here annually, compared to 921 in Britain.

Europe’s most violent

The statistics are derived from European Commission documents, and were also distributed by the United Nations.

The British Conservative Party presented the data in the form of a table, and said the Labour party is to blame for the fact that Britain is now being considered Europe’s most violent nation.

On the list, labelled the “list of shame” by the Conservatives, South Africa (3rd) and Canada (6th) are the only two non-European countries in the top ten.

The Daily Mail, however, was told by experts that the fact that “violence” is interpreted differently in different countries should be taken into account. For instance, where a disturbance is considered a violent offence under British law, in other countries such as South Africa, it’s only considered a violent offence if someone is assaulted.

Another fact which has the British public concerned is that the incidence of violence has risen by 77% since 1998.

News websites were buzzing about the information on Thursday, and South Africans in Britain took part in the commentary with great enthusiasm.

Safe?

A certain Callum wrote on the Daily Mail’s website that he didn’t believe, even for a second, that the crime level in Britain is higher than in South Africa.

“Britain and Europe are safe places to live.”

In turn, Dean from Cape Town wrote that the news about Britain’s crime levels didn’t surprise him in the least, and that it was precisely for that reason that he moved to South Africa.

“I feel much safer walking down the streets of South Africa. Most of the crime that happens here is in Johannesburg.”

Another sceptic, Alan from London, believed the South African government’s policy is “not to properly record the true crime figures”.

Wednesday, 1 July 2009

Blacks Lost Harlem; Whites Lose America